Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

If you are the recipient, simply add that sender to your ManualWhitelist. (You could also change the score of the rules that were triggered. See WritingRules).

(removed 'FORGED_JUNO_RCVD is broken

...

I just now noticed that email from my friends who use Juno is being marked as spam. They hit the

...

'

...

rules, which is already 5.2 points.

No Format

Received: (from [[my friend at]]juno.com)
 by webmail03.lax.untd.com (jqueuemail) id JN4CHC6U; Mon, 23 Feb 2004 09:05:53 PST
Received: from [199.245.163.1] by webmail03.lax.untd.com with HTTP:
	Mon, 23 Feb 2004 17:05:40 GMT
X-Originating-IP: [199.245.163.1]
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Original-From: "[[my friend at]]juno.com" <[[my friend at]]juno.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2004 17:05:40 GMT
To: [[DavidCary at]]ieee.org
Subject: Bolivar
X-Mailer: WebMail Version 2.0
Content-Type: text/plain
From: [[my friend at]]juno.com
Message-Id: <20040223.090553.5165.1153023@webmail03.lax.untd.com>
X-ContentStamp: 2:2:815233092
X-UCE-Filter-Settings: david_cary redirected to 90_OPT_OUT
X-Scanned-By: IEEE UCE Filtering Service

Currently I work around this by setting

No Format

score FORGED_JUNO_RCVD 1
score OPT_HEADER 0

but someone (question) really should fix the FORGED_JUNO_RCVD rule so it does *not* trigger on mail that truly does come from innocent Juno users.

DavidCary. This is not the correct place to report bugs – that's http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/ --JustinMason.)