Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.
Comment: Migrated to Confluence 5.3

...

Taking snapshots are easy and can be done via extended operations as well but what about reverting the server back to it's original state. Tools might be able to do this if they can access the changelog (where would it be?) especially with reverse LDIFs to revert changes. However issues arise like managing operational attributes such as modifiersName etc. When applying a change log the tool cannot easily and securely apply it with the credentials of each user who made the modification to guarantee that the servers operatioinal attribute house keeping does it's thing. You could get around this if the server supported the LDAP Proxied Authorization Control. Presuming you had the tools, access to the logs, and the proxied authorization control available the tool still could fail during the course of applying the changes and the server could go down to leave the server's state inconsistent with respect to your application data. Oh ok so So if transactions actually make it into the specifications we could solve this problem too with tooling.

...