...
| CONTEXT | LABEL | COMPONENT | TRANSLATIONS | Necessary in field widget? |
| PRODUCT | property key="AccountingProductId"> | ACCOUNTING | 17 | No, use property key="FormFieldTitle_productId"> from the product component |
| PRODUCT | property key="FormFieldTitle_productId"> | ACCOUNTING | 17 | No, use property key="FormFieldTitle_productId"> from the product component |
| PRODUCT | property key="ManufacturingProductId"> | MANUFACTURING | 13 | No, use property key="FormFieldTitle_productId"> from the product component |
| PRODUCT | property key="PartyProductId"> | PARTY | 17 | No, use property key="FormFieldTitle_productId"> from the product component |
| PRODUCT | property key="FormFieldTitle_productId"> | PRODUCT | 14 | No, use property key="FormFieldTitle_productId"> from the product component |
| PRODUCT | property key="ProductProductId"> | PRODUCT | 13 | No, use property key="FormFieldTitle_productId"> from the product component |
| PRODUCT | property key="WorkEffortProductId"> | WORKEFFORT | 13 | No, use property key="FormFieldTitle_productId"> from the product component |
| PRODUCT | property key="FormFieldTitle_productId"> | WORKEFFORT | 13 | No, use property key="FormFieldTitle_productId"> from the product component |
| PRODUCT | property key="ProductProduct"> | PRODUCT | 14 | Yes, when a number of field values of a product record are combined to be displayed in a field widget. e.g. <display description="${product.productId) - ${product.internalName}"/> |
Be smart by applying when considering enhancing OFBiz field widgets: apply common sense over dogma.
As an example: https://localhost:8443/partymgr/control/PartyFinancialHistory?partyId=EuroCustomer
...
The first overview in that screen shows invoice details (invoice id, type, date and total amount due) left of the column with title 'Outstanding amount" and right of the column with 'Amount Applied' details of an associated payment (payment Id, payment date, payment amount):
| [demo11001] | Sales Invoice | 4/25/06 | $820.28 | $0.00 | $820.28 | [demo10001] | 4/25/06 | $820.97 |
...