Delete comments <a href="http://www.aptis.info/portfolio/delete-all-comments/" target="_blank" title="Help"> <span class="aui-icon aui-icon-small aui-iconfont-help aptis-delete-all-comments-title-icon">Help</span> </a>

A few Questions: Will the policies be a straight limit or high/low marks? Wil...

Martin Ritchie | Jun 26, 2008

Policies will essentially be high water marks, applied onto queues, routing key...

Aidan Skinner | Jun 27, 2008

Unfortunately, this mechanism creates a denial-of-service vulnerability as bad ...

Ted Ross | Jun 26, 2008

Ted: The DoS is worse if you have malicious consumers, the immediate motivation...

Aidan Skinner | Jun 26, 2008

Aidan, I see your point and agree. There will continue to be interesting te...

Ted Ross | Jun 26, 2008

I've been kicking a bunch of ideas around on this front but none really grabs m...

Alan Conway | Jun 27, 2008

So, splitting this into two different problems, and rescoping to a 0-10 solutio...

Aidan Skinner | Jul 15, 2008

A couple of comments... Firstly, for 0-10, the flow control is on a per exch...

Rob Godfrey | Jul 21, 2008

0-10: Flowing producers individually is probably a better idea, although it wo...

Aidan Skinner | Jul 21, 2008

It is useful to this of what happens at the limits. Ultimately, a very fast pu...

Roger John O'Hara | Jul 28, 2008

The "slow broker" scenario isn't actually an issue. A slow broker will read mes...

Rafael H. Schloming | Jul 28, 2008

I think an explicit "hey, hold it" from the broker to the producer is the right...

Aidan Skinner | Jul 30, 2008

Delete comments Help