When reviewing tickets in Apache JIRA, the following items should be covered as part of the review process:
General |
|
|
Does it conform to the Code Style guidelines? |
|
Is there any redundant or duplicate code? |
|
Is the code as modular as possible? |
|
Can any singletons be avoided? |
|
Can any of the code be replaced with library functions? |
|
Are units of measurement used in the code consistent, both internally and with the rest of the ecosystem? |
|
|
Error-Handling |
|
|
Are all data inputs and outputs checked (for the correct type, length, format, and range) and encoded? |
|
Where third-party utilities are used, are returning errors being caught? |
|
Are invalid parameter values handled? |
|
Are any Throwable/Exceptions passed to the JVMStabilityInspector? |
|
Are errors well-documented? Does the error message tell the user how to proceed? |
|
Do exceptions propagate to the appropriate level in the code? |
|
|
Documentation |
|
|
Do comments exist and describe the intent of the code (the "why", not the "how")? |
|
Are javadocs added where appropriate? |
|
Is any unusual behavior or edge-case handling described? |
|
Are data structures and units of measurement explained? |
|
Is there any incomplete code? If so, should it be removed or flagged with a suitable marker like ‘TODO’? |
|
Does the code self-document via clear naming, abstractions, and flow control? |
|
Have NEWS.txt, the cql3 docs, and the native protocol spec been updated if needed? |
|
Is the ticket tagged with "client-impacting" and "doc-impacting", where appropriate? |
|
Has lib/licences been updated for third-party libs? Are they Apache License compatible? |
|
Is the Component on the JIRA ticket set appropriately? |
|
|
Testing |
|
|
Is the code testable? i.e. don’t add too many or hide dependencies, unable to initialize objects, test frameworks can use methods etc. |
|
Do tests exist and are they comprehensive? |
|
Do unit tests actually test that the code is performing the intended functionality? |
|
Could any test code use common functionality (e.g. ccm, dtest, or CqlTester methods) or abstract it there for reuse? |
|
If the code may be affected by multi-node clusters, are there dtests? |
|
If the code may take a long time to test properly, are there CVH tests? |
|
Is the test passing on CI for all affected branches (up to trunk, if applicable)? Are there any regressions? |
|
If patch affects read/write path, did we test for performance regressions w/multiple workloads? |
|
If adding a new feature, were tests added and performed confirming it meets the expected SLA/use-case requirements for the feature? |
|
|
Logging |
|
|
Are logging statements logged at the correct level? |
|
Are there logs in the critical path that could affect performance? |
|
Is there any log that could be added to communicate status or troubleshoot potential problems in this feature? |
|
Can any unnecessary logging statement be removed? |