Current state: Under Discussion
Discussion thread: https://firstname.lastname@example.org/msg70723.html
The AdminClient introduced by KIP-117 has a method which lists all the topics in the cluster. However, we currently don't have an efficient way to implement this. The AdminClient can make a MetadataRequest which will return information about all the topics in the cluster. However, the request will also return:
- detailed information about every broker in the cluster
- the cluster id
- the controller id
- detailed information about each topic.
In a cluster with thousands of topics and dozens of brokers, the MetadataResponse will be quite large. Most of this information is not needed for listTopics.
MetadataRequest was designed around the needs of consumers and producers, which need to periodically refresh detailed information about each topic they are producing to or consuming from. In contrast, the AdminClient often just needs to know about the presence or absence of a topic. It would be better to have a method which just listed the names of the topics which exist without adding all the other information.
We will add a new request for listing the topics in a cluster.
ListTopicsRequest (Version 0) => list_internal
list_internal => BOOLEAN
ListTopicsResponse (Version 0) => error_code [topic_listing]
topic_listing => name internal
name => STRING
internal => BOOLEAN
When creating a ListTopicsRequest, we can decide whether or not we want to see internal topics in the results. If list_internal is false, internal topics will be excluded from the results.
The result of ListTopicsResponse is only the names of the topics and whether each one is internal. We do not return information about partitions, leaders, replicas, ISRs, or the list of brokers.
ListTopicsResponse will not return information about topics that the current user does not have permission to describe.
ListTopicsRequest will be implemented by the brokers. On the client side, AdminClient#listTopics should try to use the new request if available.
Compatibility, Deprecation, and Migration Plan
When communicating with older brokers that do not implement ListTopicsRequest, the AdminClient can fall back to making a MetadataRequest.
Rather than creating a new request type, we could add flags to MetadataRequest directing it to leave out certain information in its response. This would result in a smaller MetadataResponse, but not quite as small as the ListTopicsResponse. MetadataResponse has fields that take up space even if they're empty, such as arrays of partitions, leaders, ISRs, and so forth. It would also add complexity to a request which is already somewhat complex. It seems better to simply create a new request type.