Injection
What's the difference between the Component
and InjectComponent
annotations?
The Component
annotation is used to define the type of component, and its parameter bindings. When using Component
, the template
must not define the type, and any parameter bindings are merged in:
<a t:id="home" class="nav">Back to home</a>
@Component(parameters={ "page=index" }) private PageLink home;
Here the type of component is defined by the field type. The field name is matched against the t:id
in the template. The page
parameter
is set in the Java class, and the informal class
parameter is set in the template. If the tag in the template was <t:pagelink>
,
or if the template tag included the attribute t:type="pagelink"
, then you would see an exception.
By contrast, InjectComponent
expects the component to be already defined, and doesn't allow any configuration of it:
<t:form t:id="login"> .... </t:form>
@InjectComponent private Form login;
Again, we're matching the field name to the component id, and you would get an error if the component is not defined in the template.
What's the difference between the InjectPage
and InjectContainer
annotations?
The InjectPage
annotation is used to inject some page in the application into a field of some other page. You often see it used from event handler methods:
@InjectPage private ConfirmRegistration confirmRegistration; Object onSuccessFromRegistrationForm() { confirmRegistration.setStatus("Registration accepted"); confirmRegistration.setValidationCode(userRegistrationData.getValidationCode()); return confirmRegistration; }
This code pattern is used to configure peristent properties of a page before returning it; Tapestry will send a client redirect to the page to present
the data.
InjectContainer
can be used inside a component or a mixin. In a component, it injects the immediate container of the component; this is often the top-level page object.
In a mixin, it injects the component to which the mixin is attached.
I get an exception because I have two services with the same interface, how do I handle this?
It's not uncommon to have two or more services that implement the exact same interface. When you inject, you might start by just identifying the
type of service to inject:
@Inject private ComponentEventResultProcessor processor;
Which results in the error: Service interface org.apache.tapestry5.services.ComponentEventResultProcessor is matched by 3 services: AjaxComponentEventResultProcessor, ComponentEventResultProcessor, ComponentInstanceResultProcessor. Automatic dependency resolution requires that exactly one service implement the interface.
We need more information than just the service interface type in order to identify which of the three services to inject. One possibility is to inject with the correct service id:
@InjectService("ComponentEventResultProcessor") private ComponentEventResultProcessor processor;
This works ... but it is clumsy. If the service id, "ComponentEventResultProcessor", ever changes, this code will break. It's not refactoring safe.
Instead, we should use marker annotations. If we look at TapestryModule
, where the ComponentEventResultProcessor service is defined, we'll see it identifies the necessary markers:
@Marker( { Primary.class, Traditional.class }) public ComponentEventResultProcessor buildComponentEventResultProcessor( Map<Class, ComponentEventResultProcessor> configuration) { return constructComponentEventResultProcessor(configuration); }
When a service has marker annotations, the annotations present at the point of injection (the field, method parameter, or constructor parameter) are used to select a matching service. The list of services that match by type is then filtered to only include services that have all of the marker annotations present at the point of injection.
@Inject @Traditional @Primary private ComponentEventResultProcessor processor;
The two marker annotations, Traditional
and Primary
, ensure that only a single service matches.
What's the difference between Inject
and Environmental
?
Inject
is relatively general; it can be used to inject resources specific to a page or component (such as ComponentResources, Logger, or Messages), or it can inject services or other objects obtained from the Tapestry IoC container. Once the page is loaded, the values for these injections never change.
Environmental
is different; it exposes a request-scoped, dynamically bound value
1
.
- Request scoped: different threads (processing different requests) will see different values when reading the field.
- Dynamically bound: the value is explicitly placed into the Environment, and can be overridden at any time.
Environmentals are a form of loosely connected communication between an outer component (or even a service) and an inner component. Example: the Form
component places a FormSupport
object into the environment. Other components, such as TextField, use the FormSupport
when rendering to perform functions such as allocate unique control names or register client-side validations. The TextField doesn't require that the Form component be the immediate container component, or even an ancestor: a Form on one page may, indirectly, communicate with a TextField on some entirely different page. Neither component directly links to the other, the FormSupport
is the conduit that connects them.